London

 

What teachers want

 

GEM London Training Day, Brent Museum   14 July 2006

 

What do teachers really want from museum visits?  

How can we develop our services to best serve schools? 

Where can we find the answers? 

 

This training day aimed to help museum educators improve the quality of their schools’ programming by developing a more thorough understanding of what teachers really want.

Karen Giles, Headteacher at Barham Primary School, led a frank discussion on what teachers love and hate about museum visits.  An LEA Advisor gave tips on how to build partnerships with local schools, and museum consultant, Alison James, gave information on how to consult with  teachers.

 

What Teachers Want

Introduction

 This GEM London training day focused on exploring what expectations teachers have about working with museums, what research already exists on the subject, and how museums can consult teachers directly.

The session was divided into three sections:

 Support documents

 

SECTION ONE:  TOP TEN LIST OF WHAT TEACHERS WANT FROM MUSEUMS

 Karen Giles, Headteacher at Barham Primary School provided practical advice on what teachers expect from museums and tips on how to improve the service.

 1.         Pre-visit guidance: 

 2.         Value for Money

3.         Health and Safety

4.         Motivational staff & volunteers

Museum staff/volunteers should be:

5.         Interactive learning

6.         Relevance

7.         Inclusion

8.         Outdoor learning opportunities

9.         Post-visit learning activities

10.        Outreach

Q&A information

 

SECTION TWO:  BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS WITH SCHOOLS

 In this session, Jan Kofi-Tsekpo and Jennifer Blay, the Cultural Entitlement School Liaison Officers from the MLA London, presented findings from the Strategic Commissioning Programme’s research into building stronger links between schools, museums and archives funded by the DfES and DCMS in 2005/06.

 The Strategic Commissioning Programme has 3 core aims:

  1. To survey school participation with museums and archives

  2. To raise participation, promoting lasting links between schools and local institutions

  3. To facilitate museums, archives and schools to develop creative ways of delivering the curriculum.

 In 2005/06, MLA London conducted research with London-based teachers to establish their views about museum education.  The MLA London Teachers’ Questionnaire used Inspiring Learning for All methodology to underpin the questionnaire.

 The questionnaire aimed to:

121 teachers were surveyed from 112 schools in 13 London boroughs. The responses came from 86 primary schools, 21 secondary schools, and 14 special schools.

Significant findings:

38% of schools had a ‘low or no’ participation in museums and archives (0-2 visits per year);  26% were listed at ‘high’ participation (6+ visits).  A follow up survey in 2006/07 will help establish a clearer picture of schools participation.

The majority of the schools surveyed indicated their participation with museums and archives was successful

MLA London Strategic Commissioning Activities for 2006-07

 

SECTION THREE:  CONSULTING WITH TEACHERS

Museum consultant, Alison James, provided practical notes on consultation methodology.  Consultation can help museums rate the effectiveness of their services, tailor programming to their users’ needs, avoid wasting time and money, develop ideas for future planning, establish dialogues with teachers, and use feedback in funding applications, marketing and as an advocacy tool.

Effective consultation must start with a clearly defined aim.  Before decided which consultation method/tool to use you must define the following:

 There are many different ways to consult with teachers.  Choosing your methodology largely depends on the type of information your are seeking.

Focus Groups:

This is probably the most effective method for consulting meaningfully with teachers with the bonus of potentially turning the group into an advisory panel. The main drawback is that the data is only qualitative.  The group should consist of 6-10 people and last 1 to 1.5 hours.  The session should be semi-structured using topic/question guide.  It is best to have an objective facilitator to guide the discussion and someone else to do the note taking.  Questions should be open-ended.  Focus groups are particularly useful at early stage of planning a project/resource (i.e. front end evaluation)

Focus Groups:  Strengths

 Focus Groups:  Limitations

Focus Groups:  Format

Focus Groups:  Managing the group

 Focus Groups:  Questions

 Focus Groups:  Other techniques

Focus Groups:  recording

Focus Groups:  recruitment

Focus Groups:  analysis

 

Back to London Area page